pacman::p_load(sf, raster, spatstat, tmap, tidyverse, sp)Hands-on Exercise 2
2. 1st Order Spatial Point Patterns Analysis Methods
2.1 Overview
Spatial Point Pattern Analysis is the evaluation of the pattern or distribution, of a set of points on a surface. The point can be locaiton of:
- events such as crime, traffic accident and disease onset, or
- business services (coffee and fastfood outlets) or facilities such as childcare and eldercare.
Using appropriate functions of spatstat, this hands-on exercise aims to discover the spatial point processes of childecare centres in Singapore.
The specific questions we would like to answer are as follows:
- are the childcare centres in Singapore randomly distributed throughout the country?
- if the answer is not, then the next logical question is where are the locations with higher concentration of childcare centres?
2.2 The data
To provide answers to the questions above, three data sets will be used. They are:
CHILDCARE, a point feature data providing both location and attribute information of childcare centres. It was downloaded from Data.gov.sg and is in geojson format.MP14_SUBZONE_WEB_PL, a polygon feature data providing information of URA 2014 Master Plan Planning Subzone boundary data. It is in ESRI shapefile format. This data set was also downloaded from Data.gov.sg.CostalOutline, a polygon feature data showing the national boundary of Singapore. It is provided by SLA and is in ESRI shapefile format.
2.3 Installing and loading the R packages
In this hands-on exercise, five R packages will be used, they are:
- sf, a relatively new R package specially designed to import, manage and process vector-based geospatial data in R.
- spatstat, which has a wide range of useful functions for point pattern analysis. In this hands-on exercise, it will be used to perform 1st- and 2nd-order spatial point patterns analysis and derive kernel density estimation (KDE) layer.
- raster which reads, writes, manipulates, analyses and model of gridded spatial data (i.e. raster). In this hands-on exercise, it will be used to convert image output generate by spatstat into raster format.
- maptools which provides a set of tools for manipulating geographic data. In this hands-on exercise, we mainly use it to convert Spatial objects into ppp format of spatstat.
- tmap which provides functions for plotting cartographic quality static point patterns maps or interactive maps by using leaflet API.
Use the code chunk below to install and launch the five R packages.
2.4 Spatial Data Wrangling
2.4.1 Importing the spatial data
In this section, st_read() of sf package will be used to import these three geospatial data sets into R.
childcare_sf <- st_read("data/child-care-services-geojson.geojson") %>%
st_transform(crs = 3414)Reading layer `child-care-services-geojson' from data source
`C:\Users\jia_y\OneDrive - Singapore Management University\Semester 4\ISSS626-G1 Geo Spatial Analytics and Applications\jylau91\ISSS626-GAA\Hands-on_Ex\Hands-on_Ex02\data\child-care-services-geojson.geojson'
using driver `GeoJSON'
Simple feature collection with 1545 features and 2 fields
Geometry type: POINT
Dimension: XYZ
Bounding box: xmin: 103.6824 ymin: 1.248403 xmax: 103.9897 ymax: 1.462134
z_range: zmin: 0 zmax: 0
Geodetic CRS: WGS 84sg_sf <- st_read(dsn = "data", layer="CostalOutline")Reading layer `CostalOutline' from data source
`C:\Users\jia_y\OneDrive - Singapore Management University\Semester 4\ISSS626-G1 Geo Spatial Analytics and Applications\jylau91\ISSS626-GAA\Hands-on_Ex\Hands-on_Ex02\data'
using driver `ESRI Shapefile'
Simple feature collection with 60 features and 4 fields
Geometry type: POLYGON
Dimension: XY
Bounding box: xmin: 2663.926 ymin: 16357.98 xmax: 56047.79 ymax: 50244.03
Projected CRS: SVY21mpsz_sf <- st_read(dsn = "data",
layer = "MP14_SUBZONE_WEB_PL")Reading layer `MP14_SUBZONE_WEB_PL' from data source
`C:\Users\jia_y\OneDrive - Singapore Management University\Semester 4\ISSS626-G1 Geo Spatial Analytics and Applications\jylau91\ISSS626-GAA\Hands-on_Ex\Hands-on_Ex02\data'
using driver `ESRI Shapefile'
Simple feature collection with 323 features and 15 fields
Geometry type: MULTIPOLYGON
Dimension: XY
Bounding box: xmin: 2667.538 ymin: 15748.72 xmax: 56396.44 ymax: 50256.33
Projected CRS: SVY21Before we can use these data for analysis, it is important for us to ensure that they are projected in same projection system.
DIY: Using the appropriate sf function you learned in Hands-on Exercise 2, retrieve the referencing system information of these geospatial data.
Notice that except childcare_sf, both mpsz_sf and sg_sf do not have proper crs information.
DIY: Using the method you learned in Lesson 2, assign the correct crs to mpsz_sf and sg_sf simple feature data frames.
mpsz_sf3414 <- st_set_crs(mpsz_sf, 3414)
sg_sf3414 <- st_set_crs(sg_sf, 3414)DIY: If necessary, changing the referencing system to Singapore national projected coordinate system.
4.4.2 Mapping the geospatial data sets
After checking the referencing system of each geospatial data data frame, it is also useful for us to plot a map to show their spatial patterns.
4.4.2.1 Plotting child care centres in Singapore
tm_shape(mpsz_sf3414)+
tm_polygons()+
tm_shape(childcare_sf)+
tm_dots()
Notice that all the geospatial layers are within the same map extend. This shows that their referencing system and coordinate values are referred to similar spatial context. This is very important in any geospatial analysis.
Alternatively, we can also prepare a pin map by using the code chunk below.
tmap_mode('view')
tmap_options(check.and.fix = TRUE)
tm_shape(mpsz_sf3414) +
tm_polygons(col = "lightgrey", border.col = "white") +
tm_shape(childcare_sf) +
tm_dots(col = "blue", size = 0.01) +
tm_layout(title = "Childcare Locations in Singapore") tmap_mode('plot')4.5.1 Converting sf data frames to sp’s Spatial* class
The code chunk below uses as_Spatial() of sf package to convert the three geospatial data from simple feature data frame to sp’s Spatial* class.
childcare <- as_Spatial(childcare_sf)
mpsz <- as_Spatial(mpsz_sf)
sg <- as_Spatial(sg_sf)cat("class : ", class(childcare), "\n")class : SpatialPointsDataFrame cat("features : ", nrow(childcare), "\n")features : 1545 cat("extent : ", paste(extent(childcare), collapse = ", "), "\n")extent : extent(11203.0094000911, 45404.2410000389, 25667.6009998018, 49300.8758001344) cat("crs : ", proj4string(childcare), "\n")crs : +proj=tmerc +lat_0=1.36666666666667 +lon_0=103.833333333333 +k=1 +x_0=28001.642 +y_0=38744.572 +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs cat("variables : ", length(names(childcare@data)), "\n")variables : 2 cat("names : ", paste(names(childcare@data), collapse = ", "), "\n")names : Name, Description # Display minimum and maximum values for each variable
min_values <- sapply(childcare@data, function(x) if(is.numeric(x)) min(x, na.rm = TRUE) else NA)
max_values <- sapply(childcare@data, function(x) if(is.numeric(x)) max(x, na.rm = TRUE) else NA)
cat("min values : ", paste(min_values, collapse = ", "), "\n")min values : NA, NA cat("max values : ", paste(max_values, collapse = ", "), "\n")max values : NA, NA # Function to summarize SpatialPointsDataFrame
summarize_spdf <- function(spdf) {
cat("class : ", class(spdf), "\n")
cat("features : ", nrow(spdf), "\n")
cat("extent : ", paste(extent(spdf), collapse = ", "), "\n")
cat("crs : ", proj4string(spdf), "\n")
cat("variables : ", length(names(spdf@data)), "\n")
cat("names : ", paste(names(spdf@data), collapse = ", "), "\n")
numeric_vars <- sapply(spdf@data, is.numeric)
min_values <- sapply(spdf@data[, numeric_vars], min, na.rm = TRUE)
max_values <- sapply(spdf@data[, numeric_vars], max, na.rm = TRUE)
cat("min values : ", paste(min_values, collapse = ", "), "\n")
cat("max values : ", paste(max_values, collapse = ", "), "\n")
}
# Call the function
summarize_spdf(childcare)class : SpatialPointsDataFrame
features : 1545
extent : extent(11203.0094000911, 45404.2410000389, 25667.6009998018, 49300.8758001344)
crs : +proj=tmerc +lat_0=1.36666666666667 +lon_0=103.833333333333 +k=1 +x_0=28001.642 +y_0=38744.572 +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs
variables : 2
names : Name, Description
min values :
max values : summarize_spdf(mpsz)class : SpatialPolygonsDataFrame
features : 323
extent : extent(2667.53799999971, 56396.4400000004, 15748.7210000008, 50256.3343000002)
crs : +proj=tmerc +lat_0=1.36666666666667 +lon_0=103.833333333333 +k=1 +x_0=28001.642 +y_0=38744.572 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs
variables : 15
names : OBJECTID, SUBZONE_NO, SUBZONE_N, SUBZONE_C, CA_IND, PLN_AREA_N, PLN_AREA_C, REGION_N, REGION_C, INC_CRC, FMEL_UPD_D, X_ADDR, Y_ADDR, SHAPE_Leng, SHAPE_Area
min values : 1, 1, 5092.8949, 19579.069, 871.554887798, 39437.9352703
max values : 323, 17, 50424.7923, 49552.7904, 68083.9364708, 69748298.792 summarize_spdf(sg)class : SpatialPolygonsDataFrame
features : 60
extent : extent(2663.9256, 56047.7883, 16357.981, 50244.0343)
crs : +proj=tmerc +lat_0=1.36666666666667 +lon_0=103.833333333333 +k=1 +x_0=28001.642 +y_0=38744.572 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs
variables : 4
names : GDO_GID, MSLINK, MAPID, COSTAL_NAM
min values : 1, 1, 0
max values : 60, 67, 0 4.5.2 Converting the Spatial* class into generic sp format
spatstat requires the analytical data in ppp object form. There is no direct way to convert a Spatial* classes into ppp object. We need to convert the Spatial classes* into Spatial object first.
The codes chunk below converts the Spatial* classes into generic sp objects.
childcare_sp <- as(childcare, "SpatialPoints")
sg_sp <- as(sg, "SpatialPolygons")Next, you should display the sp objects properties as shown below.
childcare_spclass : SpatialPoints
features : 1545
extent : 11203.01, 45404.24, 25667.6, 49300.88 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax)
crs : +proj=tmerc +lat_0=1.36666666666667 +lon_0=103.833333333333 +k=1 +x_0=28001.642 +y_0=38744.572 +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs sg_spclass : SpatialPolygons
features : 60
extent : 2663.926, 56047.79, 16357.98, 50244.03 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax)
crs : +proj=tmerc +lat_0=1.36666666666667 +lon_0=103.833333333333 +k=1 +x_0=28001.642 +y_0=38744.572 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs 4.5.3 Converting the generic sp format into spatstat’s ppp format
Now, we will use as.ppp() function of spatstat to convert the spatial data into spatstat’s ppp object format.
childcare_ppp <- as.ppp(childcare_sf)
childcare_pppMarked planar point pattern: 1545 points
marks are of storage type 'character'
window: rectangle = [11203.01, 45404.24] x [25667.6, 49300.88] unitsNow, let us plot childcare_ppp and examine the different.
plot(childcare_ppp)
summary(childcare_ppp)Marked planar point pattern: 1545 points
Average intensity 1.91145e-06 points per square unit
Coordinates are given to 11 decimal places
marks are of type 'character'
Summary:
Length Class Mode
1545 character character
Window: rectangle = [11203.01, 45404.24] x [25667.6, 49300.88] units
(34200 x 23630 units)
Window area = 808287000 square unitsNote: warning message about duplicates - in SPP analysis an issue of significant is the presence of duplicates. The statistical methodology used for SPP processes is based largely on the assumption that process are simple, that is, the points cannot coincide.
4.5.4 Handling duplicated points
We can check the duplication in a ppp object by using the code chunk below.
any(duplicated(childcare_ppp))[1] FALSETo count the number of co-indicence point, we will use the multiplicity() function as shown in the code chunk below.
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[38] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[75] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[112] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[149] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[186] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[223] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[260] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[297] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[334] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[371] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[408] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[445] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[482] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[519] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[556] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[593] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[630] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[667] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[704] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[741] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[778] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[815] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[852] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[889] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[926] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[963] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1000] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1037] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1074] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1111] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1148] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1185] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1222] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1259] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1296] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1333] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1370] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1407] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1444] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1481] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[1518] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1sum(multiplicity(childcare_ppp) > 1)[1] 0There are no duplicated point events as the result is 0.
4.5.5 Creating owin object
When analysing spatial point patterns, it is a good practice to confine the analysis with a geographical area like Singapore boundary. In spatstat, an object called owin is specially designed to represent this polygonal region.
The code chunk below is used to covert sg SpatialPolygon object into owin object of spatstat.
sg_owin <- as.owin(sg_sf)The ouput object can be displayed by using plot() function
plot(sg_owin)
summary(sg_owin)Window: polygonal boundary
50 separate polygons (1 hole)
vertices area relative.area
polygon 1 (hole) 30 -7081.18 -9.76e-06
polygon 2 55 82537.90 1.14e-04
polygon 3 90 415092.00 5.72e-04
polygon 4 49 16698.60 2.30e-05
polygon 5 38 24249.20 3.34e-05
polygon 6 976 23344700.00 3.22e-02
polygon 7 721 1927950.00 2.66e-03
polygon 8 1992 9992170.00 1.38e-02
polygon 9 330 1118960.00 1.54e-03
polygon 10 175 925904.00 1.28e-03
polygon 11 115 928394.00 1.28e-03
polygon 12 24 6352.39 8.76e-06
polygon 13 190 202489.00 2.79e-04
polygon 14 37 10170.50 1.40e-05
polygon 15 25 16622.70 2.29e-05
polygon 16 10 2145.07 2.96e-06
polygon 17 66 16184.10 2.23e-05
polygon 18 5195 636837000.00 8.78e-01
polygon 19 76 312332.00 4.31e-04
polygon 20 627 31891300.00 4.40e-02
polygon 21 20 32842.00 4.53e-05
polygon 22 42 55831.70 7.70e-05
polygon 23 67 1313540.00 1.81e-03
polygon 24 734 4690930.00 6.47e-03
polygon 25 16 3194.60 4.40e-06
polygon 26 15 4872.96 6.72e-06
polygon 27 15 4464.20 6.15e-06
polygon 28 14 5466.74 7.54e-06
polygon 29 37 5261.94 7.25e-06
polygon 30 111 662927.00 9.14e-04
polygon 31 69 56313.40 7.76e-05
polygon 32 143 145139.00 2.00e-04
polygon 33 397 2488210.00 3.43e-03
polygon 34 90 115991.00 1.60e-04
polygon 35 98 62682.90 8.64e-05
polygon 36 165 338736.00 4.67e-04
polygon 37 130 94046.50 1.30e-04
polygon 38 93 430642.00 5.94e-04
polygon 39 16 2010.46 2.77e-06
polygon 40 415 3253840.00 4.49e-03
polygon 41 30 10838.20 1.49e-05
polygon 42 53 34400.30 4.74e-05
polygon 43 26 8347.58 1.15e-05
polygon 44 74 58223.40 8.03e-05
polygon 45 327 2169210.00 2.99e-03
polygon 46 177 467446.00 6.44e-04
polygon 47 46 699702.00 9.65e-04
polygon 48 6 16841.00 2.32e-05
polygon 49 13 70087.30 9.66e-05
polygon 50 4 9459.63 1.30e-05
enclosing rectangle: [2663.93, 56047.79] x [16357.98, 50244.03] units
(53380 x 33890 units)
Window area = 725376000 square units
Fraction of frame area: 0.401
4.5.6 Combining point events object and owin object
In this last step of geospatial data wrangling, we will extract childcare events that are located within Singapore by using the code chunk below.
childcareSG_ppp = childcare_ppp[sg_owin]The output object combined both the point and polygon feature in one ppp object class as shown below.
summary(childcareSG_ppp)Marked planar point pattern: 1545 points
Average intensity 2.129929e-06 points per square unit
Coordinates are given to 11 decimal places
marks are of type 'character'
Summary:
Length Class Mode
1545 character character
Window: polygonal boundary
50 separate polygons (1 hole)
vertices area relative.area
polygon 1 (hole) 30 -7081.18 -9.76e-06
polygon 2 55 82537.90 1.14e-04
polygon 3 90 415092.00 5.72e-04
polygon 4 49 16698.60 2.30e-05
polygon 5 38 24249.20 3.34e-05
polygon 6 976 23344700.00 3.22e-02
polygon 7 721 1927950.00 2.66e-03
polygon 8 1992 9992170.00 1.38e-02
polygon 9 330 1118960.00 1.54e-03
polygon 10 175 925904.00 1.28e-03
polygon 11 115 928394.00 1.28e-03
polygon 12 24 6352.39 8.76e-06
polygon 13 190 202489.00 2.79e-04
polygon 14 37 10170.50 1.40e-05
polygon 15 25 16622.70 2.29e-05
polygon 16 10 2145.07 2.96e-06
polygon 17 66 16184.10 2.23e-05
polygon 18 5195 636837000.00 8.78e-01
polygon 19 76 312332.00 4.31e-04
polygon 20 627 31891300.00 4.40e-02
polygon 21 20 32842.00 4.53e-05
polygon 22 42 55831.70 7.70e-05
polygon 23 67 1313540.00 1.81e-03
polygon 24 734 4690930.00 6.47e-03
polygon 25 16 3194.60 4.40e-06
polygon 26 15 4872.96 6.72e-06
polygon 27 15 4464.20 6.15e-06
polygon 28 14 5466.74 7.54e-06
polygon 29 37 5261.94 7.25e-06
polygon 30 111 662927.00 9.14e-04
polygon 31 69 56313.40 7.76e-05
polygon 32 143 145139.00 2.00e-04
polygon 33 397 2488210.00 3.43e-03
polygon 34 90 115991.00 1.60e-04
polygon 35 98 62682.90 8.64e-05
polygon 36 165 338736.00 4.67e-04
polygon 37 130 94046.50 1.30e-04
polygon 38 93 430642.00 5.94e-04
polygon 39 16 2010.46 2.77e-06
polygon 40 415 3253840.00 4.49e-03
polygon 41 30 10838.20 1.49e-05
polygon 42 53 34400.30 4.74e-05
polygon 43 26 8347.58 1.15e-05
polygon 44 74 58223.40 8.03e-05
polygon 45 327 2169210.00 2.99e-03
polygon 46 177 467446.00 6.44e-04
polygon 47 46 699702.00 9.65e-04
polygon 48 6 16841.00 2.32e-05
polygon 49 13 70087.30 9.66e-05
polygon 50 4 9459.63 1.30e-05
enclosing rectangle: [2663.93, 56047.79] x [16357.98, 50244.03] units
(53380 x 33890 units)
Window area = 725376000 square units
Fraction of frame area: 0.401childcareSG_ppp <- as.ppp(childcareSG_ppp)
plot(childcareSG_ppp)
4.6.1 Kernel Density Estimation
In this section, you will learn how to compute the kernel density estimation (KDE) of childcare services in Singapore.
4.6.1.1 Computing kernel density estimation using automatic bandwidth selection method
The code chunk below computes a kernel density by using the following configurations of density() of spatstat:
bw.diggle() automatic bandwidth selection method. Other recommended methods are bw.CvL(), bw.scott() or bw.ppl().
The smoothing kernel used is gaussian, which is the default. Other smoothing methods are: “epanechnikov”, “quartic” or “disc”.
The intensity estimate is corrected for edge effect bias by using method described by Jones (1993) and Diggle (2010, equation 18.9). The default is FALSE.
kde_childcareSG_bw <- density(childcareSG_ppp,
sigma=bw.diggle,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian") The plot() function of Base R is then used to display the kernel density derived.
plot(kde_childcareSG_bw)
The density values of the output range from 0 to 0.000035 which is way too small to comprehend. This is because the default unit of measurement of svy21 is in meter. As a result, the density values computed is in “number of points per square meter”.
Before we move on to next section, it is good to know that you can retrieve the bandwidth used to compute the kde layer by using the code chunk below.
bw <- bw.diggle(childcareSG_ppp)
bw sigma
298.4095 4.6.1.2 Rescalling KDE values
In the code chunk below, rescale.ppp() is used to covert the unit of measurement from meter to kilometer.
childcareSG_ppp.km <- rescale.ppp(childcareSG_ppp, 1000, "km")Now, we can re-run density() using the resale data set and plot the output kde map.
kde_childcareSG.bw <- density(childcareSG_ppp.km, sigma=bw.diggle, edge=TRUE, kernel="gaussian")
plot(kde_childcareSG.bw)
Notice that output image looks identical to the earlier version, the only changes in the data values (refer to the legend).
4.6.2 Working with different automatic badwidth methods
Beside bw.diggle(), there are three other spatstat functions can be used to determine the bandwidth, they are: bw.CvL(), bw.scott(), and bw.ppl().
Let us take a look at the bandwidth return by these automatic bandwidth calculation methods by using the code chunk below.
bw.CvL(childcareSG_ppp.km) sigma
4.543278 bw.scott(childcareSG_ppp.km) sigma.x sigma.y
2.224898 1.450966 bw.ppl(childcareSG_ppp.km) sigma
0.3897114 bw.diggle(childcareSG_ppp.km) sigma
0.2984095 Baddeley et. (2016) suggested the use of the bw.ppl() algorithm because in ther experience it tends to produce the more appropriate values when the pattern consists predominantly of tight clusters. But they also insist that if the purpose of once study is to detect a single tight cluster in the midst of random noise then the bw.diggle() method seems to work best.
The code chunk beow will be used to compare the output of using bw.diggle and bw.ppl methods.
kde_childcareSG.ppl <- density(childcareSG_ppp.km,
sigma=bw.ppl,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian")
par(mfrow=c(1,2))
plot(kde_childcareSG.bw, main = "bw.diggle")
plot(kde_childcareSG.ppl, main = "bw.ppl")
4.6.3 Working with different kernel methods
By default, the kernel method used in density.ppp() is gaussian. But there are three other options, namely: Epanechnikov, Quartic and Dics.
The code chunk below will be used to compute three more kernel density estimations by using these three kernel function.
par(mfrow=c(2,2))
plot(density(childcareSG_ppp.km,
sigma=bw.ppl,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian"),
main="Gaussian")
plot(density(childcareSG_ppp.km,
sigma=bw.ppl,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="epanechnikov"),
main="Epanechnikov")
plot(density(childcareSG_ppp.km,
sigma=bw.ppl,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="quartic"),
main="Quartic")
plot(density(childcareSG_ppp.km,
sigma=bw.ppl,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="disc"),
main="Disc")
4.7 Fixed and Adaptive KDE
4.7.1 Computing KDE by using fixed bandwidth
Next, you will compute a KDE layer by defining a bandwidth of 600 meter. Notice that in the code chunk below, the sigma value used is 0.6. This is because the unit of measurement of childcareSG_ppp.km object is in kilometer, hence the 600m is 0.6km.
kde_childcareSG_600 <- density(childcareSG_ppp.km, sigma=0.6, edge=TRUE, kernel="gaussian")
plot(kde_childcareSG_600)
4.7.2 Computing KDE by using adaptive bandwidth
Fixed bandwidth method is very sensitive to highly skew distribution of spatial point patterns over geographical units for example urban versus rural. One way to overcome this problem is by using adaptive bandwidth instead.
In this section, you will learn how to derive adaptive kernel density estimation by using density.adaptive() of spatstat.
kde_childcareSG_adaptive <- adaptive.density(childcareSG_ppp.km, method="kernel")
plot(kde_childcareSG_adaptive)
We can compare the fixed and adaptive kernel density estimation outputs by using the code chunk below.
par(mfrow=c(1,2))
plot(kde_childcareSG.bw, main = "Fixed bandwidth")
plot(kde_childcareSG_adaptive, main = "Adaptive bandwidth")
4.7.3 Converting KDE output into grid object.
The result is the same, we just convert it so that it is suitable for mapping purposes
kde_childcareSG.bwreal-valued pixel image
128 x 128 pixel array (ny, nx)
enclosing rectangle: [2.6639, 56.048] x [16.358, 50.244] km# Assuming kde_childcareSG.bw is an object of class 'im' from spatstat
library(sp)
library(spatstat)
# Extract the pixel coordinates and values from the 'im' object
coords <- expand.grid(x = kde_childcareSG.bw$xcol, y = kde_childcareSG.bw$yrow)
values <- as.vector(t(kde_childcareSG.bw$v))
# Create a SpatialPixelsDataFrame
sp_pixels <- SpatialPixelsDataFrame(points = coords,
data = data.frame(value = values),
proj4string = CRS(as.character(NA)))
# Convert the SpatialPixelsDataFrame to a SpatialGridDataFrame
gridded_kde_childcareSG_bw <- as(sp_pixels, "SpatialGridDataFrame")
# Use spplot to plot the SpatialGridDataFrame
spplot(gridded_kde_childcareSG_bw)
4.7.3.1 Converting gridded output into raster
Next, we will convert the gridded kernal density objects into RasterLayer object by using raster() of raster package.
kde_childcareSG_bw_raster <- raster(kde_childcareSG.bw)
kde_childcareSG_bw_rasterclass : RasterLayer
dimensions : 128, 128, 16384 (nrow, ncol, ncell)
resolution : 0.4170614, 0.2647348 (x, y)
extent : 2.663926, 56.04779, 16.35798, 50.24403 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax)
crs : NA
source : memory
names : layer
values : -8.476185e-15, 28.51831 (min, max)4.7.3.2 Assigning projection systems
The code chunk below will be used to include the CRS information on kde_childcareSG_bw_raster RasterLayer.
projection(kde_childcareSG_bw_raster) <- CRS("+init=EPSG:3414")
kde_childcareSG_bw_rasterclass : RasterLayer
dimensions : 128, 128, 16384 (nrow, ncol, ncell)
resolution : 0.4170614, 0.2647348 (x, y)
extent : 2.663926, 56.04779, 16.35798, 50.24403 (xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax)
crs : +proj=tmerc +lat_0=1.36666666666667 +lon_0=103.833333333333 +k=1 +x_0=28001.642 +y_0=38744.572 +ellps=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs
source : memory
names : layer
values : -8.476185e-15, 28.51831 (min, max)Notice that the crs property is completed.
4.7.4 Visualising the output in tmap
Finally, we will display the raster in cartographic quality map using tmap package.
tm_shape(kde_childcareSG_bw_raster) +
tm_raster("layer", palette = "viridis") +
tm_layout(legend.position = c("right", "bottom"), frame = FALSE)
4.7.5 Comparing Spatial Point Patterns using KDE
In this section, you will learn how to compare KDE of childcare at Ponggol, Tampines, Chua Chu Kang and Jurong West planning areas.
4.7.5.1 Extracting study area
The code chunk below will be used to extract the target planning areas.
pg <- mpsz_sf %>%
filter(PLN_AREA_N == "PUNGGOL")
tm <- mpsz_sf %>%
filter(PLN_AREA_N == "TAMPINES")
ck <- mpsz_sf %>%
filter(PLN_AREA_N == "CHOA CHU KANG")
jw <- mpsz_sf %>%
filter(PLN_AREA_N == "JURONG WEST")Plotting target planning areas
par(mfrow=c(2,2))
plot(pg, main = "Ponggol")
plot(tm, main = "Tampines")
plot(ck, main = "Choa Chu Kang")
plot(jw, main = "Jurong West")
4.7.5.2 Creating owin object
Now, we will convert these sf objects into owin objects that is required by spatstat.
pg_owin = as.owin(pg)
tm_owin = as.owin(tm)
ck_owin = as.owin(ck)
jw_owin = as.owin(jw)4.7.5.3 Combining childcare points and the study area
By using the code chunk below, we are able to extract childcare that is within the specific region to do our analysis later on.
childcare_pg_ppp = childcare_ppp[pg_owin]
childcare_tm_ppp = childcare_ppp[tm_owin]
childcare_ck_ppp = childcare_ppp[ck_owin]
childcare_jw_ppp = childcare_ppp[jw_owin]Next, rescale.ppp() function is used to trasnform the unit of measurement from metre to kilometre.
childcare_pg_ppp.km = rescale.ppp(childcare_pg_ppp, 1000, "km")
childcare_tm_ppp.km = rescale.ppp(childcare_tm_ppp, 1000, "km")
childcare_ck_ppp.km = rescale.ppp(childcare_ck_ppp, 1000, "km")
childcare_jw_ppp.km = rescale.ppp(childcare_jw_ppp, 1000, "km")The code chunk below is used to plot these four study areas and the locations of the childcare centres.
par(mfrow=c(2,2))
plot(childcare_pg_ppp.km, main="Punggol")
plot(childcare_tm_ppp.km, main="Tampines")
plot(childcare_ck_ppp.km, main="Choa Chu Kang")
plot(childcare_jw_ppp.km, main="Jurong West")
4.7.5.4 Computing KDE
The code chunk below will be used to compute the KDE of these four planning area. bw.diggle method is used to derive the bandwidth of each
par(mfrow=c(2,2))
plot(density(childcare_pg_ppp.km,
sigma=bw.diggle,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian"),
main="Punggol")
plot(density(childcare_tm_ppp.km,
sigma=bw.diggle,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian"),
main="Tempines")
plot(density(childcare_ck_ppp.km,
sigma=bw.diggle,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian"),
main="Choa Chu Kang")
plot(density(childcare_jw_ppp.km,
sigma=bw.diggle,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian"),
main="JUrong West")
4.7.5.5 Computing fixed bandwidth KDE
For comparison purposes, we will use 250m as the bandwidth.
par(mfrow=c(2,2))
plot(density(childcare_ck_ppp.km,
sigma=0.25,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian"),
main="Chou Chu Kang")
plot(density(childcare_jw_ppp.km,
sigma=0.25,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian"),
main="JUrong West")
plot(density(childcare_pg_ppp.km,
sigma=0.25,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian"),
main="Punggol")
plot(density(childcare_tm_ppp.km,
sigma=0.25,
edge=TRUE,
kernel="gaussian"),
main="Tampines")
4.8 Nearest Neighbour Analysis
In this section, we will perform the Clark-Evans test of aggregation for a spatial point pattern by using clarkevans.test() of statspat.
The test hypotheses are:
Ho = The distribution of childcare services are randomly distributed.
H1= The distribution of childcare services are not randomly distributed.
The 95% confident interval will be used.
4.8.1 Testing spatial point patterns using Clark and Evans Test
clarkevans.test(childcareSG_ppp,
correction="none",
clipregion="sg_owin",
alternative=c("clustered"),
nsim=99)
Clark-Evans test
No edge correction
Z-test
data: childcareSG_ppp
R = 0.55631, p-value < 2.2e-16
alternative hypothesis: clustered (R < 1)R-value (Clark-Evans ratio) of 1 suggests that the points follow a completely random distribution. R-value less than 1 (in this set of test results) indicates clustering, while an R-value greater than 1 indicates dispersion.
p-value < 2.2e-16, which is a very small p-value (i.e. <0.05 - 95% significance level) suggests that the test result is statistically significant. The null hypothesis of CSR (i.e. randomness) can be rejected.
The spatial point pattern for childcareSG_ppp shows a signifciant degree of clustering (R < 1), given the small p-value we have sufficent evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the points are not randomly distributed and is clustered as the R-value is less than 1.
4.8.2 Clark and Evans Test: Choa Chu Kang planning area
In the code chunk below, clarkevans.test() of spatstat is used to performs Clark-Evans test of aggregation for childcare centre in Choa Chu Kang planning area.
clarkevans.test(childcare_ck_ppp,
correction="none",
clipregion=NULL,
alternative=c("two.sided"),
nsim=999)
Clark-Evans test
No edge correction
Z-test
data: childcare_ck_ppp
R = 0.91415, p-value = 0.1996
alternative hypothesis: two-sidedR = 0.91415, indicating slight clustering tendency
p-value = 0.1996, fail to reject null hypothesis of random distribution. Suggesting that the observed clustering could be due to random chance as there is insufficient evidence to conclude that points are non-randomly clustered.
4.8.3 Clark and Evans Test: Tampines planning area
In the code chunk below, the similar test is used to analyse the spatial point patterns of childcare centre in Tampines planning area.
clarkevans.test(childcare_tm_ppp,
correction="none",
clipregion=NULL,
alternative=c("two.sided"),
nsim=999)
Clark-Evans test
No edge correction
Z-test
data: childcare_tm_ppp
R = 0.77989, p-value = 7.112e-05
alternative hypothesis: two-sidedR = 0.77989, indicating a clustering tendency.
p-value = 7.112e-05, sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis of a random distribution. Suggesting that the clustering of points (i.e. childcare centres) in Tampines planning area is not random.